Dari Layar ke Tatap Muka: Analisis Perilaku Fenomena Degradasi Etika Siswa Pasca COVID-19 Dalam Perspektif Filosofi Buber, Dreyfus, dan Merleau-Ponty
Main Article Content
Abstract
Penelitian ini berusaha mengkaji dan menganalisa siswa angkatan pasca pandemi COVID-19 yang mengalami degradasi etika ketika harus kembali ke pembalajaran tatap muka. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menggambarkan, menganalisis, memetakan, sekaligus memahami bagaimana dinamika siswa tersebut baik ketika belajar daring, maupun ketika kembali belajar tatap muka melalui analisis komprehensif yang dielaborasikan dengan pendekatan filsafat dari Martin Buber, Hubert Dreyfus, dan Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Data penelitian diperoleh dari wawancara dan observasi dari dua orang subjek siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas di Kota Bogor yang memiliki pengalaman pembelajaran daring ketika pandemi COVID-19 yang bersedia untuk diwawancara. Data wawancara dan observasi tersebut kemudian dianalisa secara mendalam dalam bentuk kerangka Logic Model of Problem. Hasil penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa perilaku yang dicap ’kurang beretika’ oleh siswa dipengaruhi oleh penurunan kemampuan sosial, perasaan alienasi & tidak diperhatikan, penurunan tingkat motivasi & makna, penurunan tingkat kesejahteraan & kepuasan psikologis, dll. Faktor-faktor tersebut memengaruhi faktor lain dan memengaruhi masalah kesehatan yang diderita oleh subjek, seperti penurunan kemampuan interpersonal & psikososial, meningkatnya tingkat kecenderungan depresi, dan meningkatnya tingkat kecemasan & stress. Masalah kesehatan tersebut juga mengganggu kualitas hidup pelaku, diantaranya penurunan pengetahuan etika, penurunan pengetahuan & kesadaran batas-batas sosial, rasa empati sosial yang rendah, dan berimbas pada kemungkinan ketidakmatangan bersikap yang menimbulkan kesan ’kurang beretika’ bagi orang lain.
Article Details
References
Antonio, C. A. (2019). Reflections on a Qualitative Interview. Journal of Health Research, 23, 54–58.
Asakavičiūtė, V., Sederevičiūtė-Pačiauskienė, Ž., & Valantinaitė, I. (2022). I–Thou Communication in Distant Education from the Perspective of Martin Buber’s Philosophy. Filosofija. Sociologija, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.v33i1.4666
Branchu, C., & Flaureau, E. (2022). “I’m not listening to my teacher, I’m listening to my computer”: online learning, disengagement, and the impact of COVID-19 on French university students. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00854-4
Davenport, D. (2013). The Two (Computational) Faces of AI. Conference on Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence, 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31674-6_4
Dawod, Z., & Bell, D. (2020). Semantically Annotated Learning Media for Reduced Cognitive Load (pp. 145–164). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50506-6_11
De Caro-Barek, V., Lysne, D. A., Støckert, R., Solbjørg, O. K., & Flem Røren, K. A. (2024). Places of Learning: A Discussion of Radcliffe’s Framework for Learning Spaces in Light of Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology. Nordic Studies in Education, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.23865/nse.v44.5654
Fernandez, M. E., Ruiter, R. A. C., Markham, C. M., & Kok, G. (2019). Intervention Mapping: Theory- and Evidence-Based Health Promotion Program Planning: Perspective and Examples. Frontiers in Public Health, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00209
Galea, S., Merchant, R. M., & Lurie, N. (2020). The Mental Health Consequences of COVID-19 and Physical Distancing. JAMA Internal Medicine, 180(6), 817. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1562
Gustianto, R., Cangara, H., & Rahman, A. (2022). Analysis of Teacher and Student Interaction Patterns During Online Learning at the Covid-19 Pandemic Period at SMP Negeri 3 Anggeraja. Proceedings of the International Conference on Communication, Policy and Social Science , 682. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-07-7_57
Hari Rajan, M., Herbert, C., & Polly, P. (2024). Disrupted student engagement and motivation: observations from online and face-to-face university learning environments. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1320822
Irawan, A. W., Dwisona, D., & Lestari, M. (2020). Psychological Impacts of Students on Online Learning During the Pandemic COVID-19. KONSELI : Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling (E-Journal), 7(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.24042/kons.v7i1.6389
Januarti, N. E., Nugroho, H., & Sujito, A. (2023). Negotiation and compromise in online learning during the Covid-19 pandemic. Informasi, 53(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v53i1.61339
Kalu, M. (2019). Using Emphasis-Purposeful Sampling-Phenomenon of Interest–Context (EPPiC) Framework to Reflect on Two Qualitative Research Designs and Questions: A Reflective Process. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.4082
Kiviaho-Kallio, P., & Dimkar, A. (2022). What Happened To Us? The Effects of Online Learning on Embodied Encounters During Covid-19. 3043–3052. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2022.0761
MacKay, M. H., McDonald, J., & Reed, A. C. (2025). Designing for Relational Ethics in Online and Blended Learning: Levinas, Buber, and Teaching Interfaith Ethics. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 44(1), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-024-09971-2
McShane, K. (2006). Technologies transforming academics : academic identity and online teaching.
Moleong, Lexi. J. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muhammadiah, M., Muliadi, M., Hamsiah, A., & Fitriani, F. (2022). The Students’ Ethics, Trust and Information Seeking Pattern During COVID-19 Pandemic. The New Educational Review, 67, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2022.67.1.05
Pamungkas, D. E., & Sukarman, S. (2020). TRANSFORMASI DUNIA PENDIDIKAN DI SEKOLAH DASAR DALAM MASA PANDEMI COVID-19. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Hasil Penelitian, 6(3), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpd.v6n3.p211-219
Raflisyah, M., Yasmin, I., & Latifa, N. A. (2023). Paradigm Shift In Lecturing Towards Students In The Post-Pandemic Context: Challenges And Ethical Implications. Community Services: Sustainability Development, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.61857/cssdev.v1i1.37
Rodríguez-Jiménez, R.-M., Carmona, M., García-Merino, S., Díaz-Ureña, G., & Lara Bercial, P. J. (2022). Embodied Learning for Well-Being, Self-Awareness, and Stress Regulation: A Randomized Trial with Engineering Students Using a Mixed-Method Approach. Education Sciences, 12(2), 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020111
Ryu, S., & Price, S. K. (2022). Embodied storytelling and meaning-making at the end of life: VoicingHan avatar life-review for palliative care in cancer patients. Arts & Health, 14(3), 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/17533015.2021.1942939
Sappey, J. (2023). Digital Technology Education and its Impact on Traditional Academic Roles and Practice.
Sun, H.-L., Sun, T., Sha, F.-Y., Gu, X.-Y., Hou, X.-R., Zhu, F.-Y., & Fang, P.-T. (2022). The Influence of Teacher–Student Interaction on the Effects of Online Learning: Based on a Serial Mediating Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.779217
Susilowati, Y., & Isfahani, R. (2023). Fenomena Degradasi Etika dan Minat Belajar Siswa SMP/SMA Pasca Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh (PJJ) Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di Wilayah Tangerang Tahun 2022. Jurnal Pendidikan Abad Ke-21, 1(2), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.53889/jpak.v1i2.307
Taskin, L. (2021). Qualitative Research Methods. In Research Design in Clinical Psychology (pp. 153–170). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108236164.010
Ward, D. (2018). What’s Lacking in Online Learning? Dreyfus, Merleau-Ponty and Bodily Affective Understanding. Journal of Philosophy of Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12305
Wong, A. W. K., Fong, M. W. M., Munsell, E. G. S., Metts, C. L., Lee, S. I., Nicol, G. E., DePaul, O., Tomazin, S. E., Kaufman, K. J., & Mohr, D. C. (2023). Using Intervention Mapping and Behavior Change Techniques to Develop a Digital Intervention for Self-Management in Stroke: Development Study. JMIR Human Factors, 10, e45099. https://doi.org/10.2196/45099
Ziderman, A. (2022). Better Use an Arrow: ‘I-Thou,’ ‘Relation,’ and Their Difference in Martin Buber’s I and Thou. Naharaim, 16(2), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1515/naha-2022-0006