Analisis Mekanisme Penyelesaian Konflik Norma Peraturan Menteri Terhadap Undang-Undang: Urgensi Rekonstruksi Pengaturan
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to examine the juridical construction related to the mechanism for resolving norm conflicts within the Indonesian legal system, as well as to formulate strategies to strengthen mediation mechanisms in resolving norm conflicts in the future. The existence of differences in regulatory substance between Law Number 12 of 2011 in conjunction with Law Number 13 of 2022 and the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 2 of 2019 has created ambiguity in determining the authority of institutions responsible for resolving norm conflicts between ministerial regulations and laws. This research employs a normative method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the current regulations regarding mechanisms for resolving norm conflicts within Indonesia's legal system remain inconsistent, resulting in legal uncertainty. Therefore, regulatory reconstruction is necessary to develop a robust, consistent, and procedural norm conflict resolution mechanism.
Article Details
References
Buku
Andi Hamzah. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.
Jimly Asshiddiqie. Perihal Undang-Undang. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2011.
Maria Farida Indrati. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan: Jenis, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2007.
Hadjon, Pilipus M. Argumentasi Hukum. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2005.
Ridwan HR. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2011.
Jurnal Ilmiah
Ahmad Redi. Penyelesaian Konflik Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 14, no. 3
(2017): 225–237. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v14i3.63.
Andi Muchtar. “Good Governance dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 6, no. 2 (2017): 199-213. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v6i2.89.
Andryan, A. Implikasi Putusan Hak Uji Materil di Mahkamah Agung terhadap Legalitas Pimpinan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 18 no. 3 (2018), 367-380. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.V18.367-380
Dwi Putri Cahyani. “Kedudukan Peraturan Menteri Dalam Sistem Perundang-Undangan Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan 13, no. 2 (2018): 305–318. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v13i2.826.
Rahmi Handayani. “Konflik Peraturan Perundang-Undangan: Kajian atas Mekanisme Penyelesaiannya dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 15, no. 4 (2018): 853–870. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1545.
Siti Rohani. “Optimalisasi Peran Lembaga Pengawas dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 9, no. 2 (2020): 287–305. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i2.502.
Simanjuntak, E. (2018). Kewenangan Hak Uji Materil Pada Mahkamah Agung RI. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 2(3), 337-356. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.25216/JHP.2.3.2013.337-356
T. Koopmans. “Constitutional Review in Western Europe.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 35, no. 1 (1987): 53–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/840157.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2011 Nomor 82 Dan Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5234).
Peraturan Menteri Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 Tentang Penyelesaian Disharmoni Peraturan Perundang Undangan Melalui Media.